Writing

The Universal Connectivity Theory Revision #1

By MayckoM

Social & Cultural

Revised: 16-May-2011
Added: 16-May-2011
Canada

Average rating: Not Rated
0 comments
Science, culture, essay

Just an essay.

Click to shrink font size Click to enlarge font size

Chapter

1

Human society has made it through at least 21 centuries; through years of revolution, evolution and discovery. Each day these so-called intellectual beings make discoveries, furthering technology. From macro inventions such as the wheel to micro inventions much like carbon nano-tubes, it is unfortunate that humans have not made the clear connection between each discovery. The connection of the fundamental theories and laws of the physical universe will create a new foundation for a world where intolerance is a disease and is curable through the replacement of this empty space in the mind with knowledge and information. A lot of intolerance comes from the personal preference of individuals, who often support their arguments with science. What happens is that these people using inductive reasoning, where if one thing is a certain way then it is representative of everything else like it. In example, a man’s race is white, therefore all men and women must be white, and if one is not then one cannot be treated as equal. Another example, humans are more commonly known to partner in opposite sexes, therefore all sex partners must be man and woman. This is wrong. Life is far more complex than to simply categorize it under the analysis of inductive reasoning’s microscope. Deduction is by far the best means of understanding life. Why? Because through deduction one is able to provide proof and if the proof illuminates truth to the theory then the theory is assumed to be correct. For example, from the scientific point of view: life always precedes death, plants and animals have life, therefore plants and animals will die. Had time and place been permitting, the contributions and collaborations of great people like Darwin and his concept of natural selection, Newton and Einstein involved in the basic laws of motion matter, energy and conservation, followed by the support of quantum physics, which then in turn is reaffirmed in physical experiments would have provided the human industry with a standard for social acceptance. The combination of all this genius has provided us with a reason to be tolerable, starting with the process of life and evolution.
Darwin’s great proposal “survival of the fittest” insists that species of any animal are existent today because they contain adaptations that are allow them to survive and procreate to produce more like them with the same variation in their genetics. This cannot be disputed because it has been tested to be true. To name a few, animals like alligators, turtles, lizards, sharks and animals with the ability to fly have existed in pre-historic times. It’s clear that these animals are still existent because their modifications have allowed to procreate and proceed with life. Since this is the case, it must apply to humans as well, as they are classified in biology under animals. Therefore, Homo sapiens and all their various alterations are designed to exist in the world today. Both colour and sexuality are supported by Darwin’s proposal which, to re-instate, is tested and true. What does this say about individuals who are judgmental and use pejorative language to describe those who are of different race and orientation? It is saying they are defying a phenomenon of nature and are disregarding the idea that these changes are okay. What they fail to recognize is that these new forms of humans may be the new lead in the succession of the human race. What if the world was to end in during the final days of the year 2012? What if these mutations had not occurred? What if the coloured and gay people were mass-murdered because it was determined that it was wrong to be born that way (when there is no proof that it is wrong)? Then the survival of man has been compromised through the prejudice and defiance of nature’s natural occurrence. Also, though it may be argued that some metamorphoses aren’t meant to survive changes in environment, these changes that are were apparent from the fourth century and are still present today is unarguably in place to better the human species. It is plainly verified that people who are different should, if anything, be treated with more care as they could hold the key in genetics to the evolution and supremacy of human beings. To delve further in to the idea of evolution, where did all living things come from? Surely all living things didn’t just appear on earth, fossil dating has shown that. It is believed that all living things on earth come from a common ancestor. That is, there was one in the beginning which had mutations and adaptations, which created several. Those several had their own alterations which created many, until eventually humans came about. Humans as it seems are now changing and evolving. What better to do than to follow other laws of science and allow things to continue along, to continue to move in its destined straight line?

Newton introduced to the world the concept of his three laws, the second being the topic of interest:
2. When a force is applied to a body then the body will have acceleration in the direction in which the force is being applied.
Force can be applied through pressure which can come from heat. The earth is constantly receiving heat from the core and from the sun. Since it is proven that temperatures are continually approaching higher than normal numbers on the surface of the earth then it’s safe to speculate that the earth is gaining more heat than it is sending away. This increase in temperature provides higher pressure, given the acceptance of the law of conservation of energy. This law implies that energy can never be created or destroyed, but only transformed. Also comparable, is the law of conservation of matter, which parallels the law of conservation of energy, but in terms of matter. Along with the introduction of quantum physics and the proven existence of the photon, it is obvious that there is a direct connection between the conversions of mass to energy, vice versa. A photon is an elementary particle, but it is considered to be energy, specifically light. Photons are found in energy jumps of atoms, and various atomic level events. For example, when an atom jumps energy levels it is usually receiving or disposing of a photon, that is energy, and creating unstable atoms eventually creating some form of atom decay to create a more stable atom—that is the release of a proton or electron or both. The discovery of this confirms the correlation between the transformations from matter to energy and back. Simply put, an animal may eat/degenerate food and from that matter there is energy created. It is then safe to assume that matter is just a complex stored and condensed form of energy. To further prove this, it is best to bring back to life Einstein. Since that is not impossible currently, the use of his famous equation will suffice.

Simply, energy is equal to mass multiplied by the squared velocity of light. The rearrangement of this equation will show that energy may be converted and returned back to mass.

Since the speed of light is incomprehensively fast, squaring it will only make it that much faster. So, this implies that one would need incomprehensively large amounts of energy to create mass. It has been done through particle accelerators, not a lot of mass has been made, but the product was still be mass, proving that this equation when altered is evidence enough that there is a relationship between mass and energy and their transformations into each other. To extrapolate, all humans (maybe only most) experience energy and have seen light, then it’s indisputable that humans are incident to the creation of mass from energy. In the summation of all this information, if mass is being transformed into energy and energy into mass, all living things expel absorb energy and contain mass, then isn’t it easy to conclude that at one point or another all living things have indirectly been a part of each other? Not strictly all living things, but all things? With this it is self-abusive to insult and make fun of someone of the same species. Not only is this evident in the physical world, but in mathematics, the language of pure logic reaffirms this.
In quantum physics is the study of the physical world in mathematical terms. It is quantitatively assessing the world in numbers, in pure science. In the world of quantum physics, there is no distinction between anything, it is all one expression. It is the duality and synchronization of energy and matter. To be more specific, it is the wave-like motions of all things, expressed in numbers. Looking at the Kinetic Molecular Theory (KMT) it says that all things are in constant motion. Vibrating at different frequencies, but everything is always in motion. This helps to introduce the collision theory that specifies that for a chemical reaction (successful collision of particles) to occur (matter into energy, vice versa) there must be proper geometry, proper energy levels, and a sufficient amount of entropy. Entropy is the chaotic nature or randomness of the particles. The more entropy the more successful collisions occur. With this, the KMT has shown that all things are always in motion proving that there will always been some form of chemical reaction (given that there is enough heat in the earth, which current news has assured there is) occurring. This means that there is always a transformation from matter to energy. This then continues the cycle of all things being a part of each other, essentially to say that everything is one thing, one system with organic and inorganic sub-systems. The use of quantum mechanics has supported this and presents a purely logical representation of this system, the world, the universe. If the proof of logic isn’t enough, then it’s best to return to the physical world where experiments have proven the indistinguishable difference between mass and energy and space.
According to the experiments done by Rutherford, Geiger and Marsden, the gold foil experiment, matter is mostly space. Though Geiger and Marsden worked together, and Rutherford alone, they still ended up with the same results. Initially, the purpose was to identify the structure of an atom, which was found and eventually led to an idea and visual representation of the physical world. Alpha particles were short at an extremely thin, but solid, gold foil. Alpha particles are also known as helium nucleus with a positive charge. Behind and around the gold foil was a thicker sheet of zinc sulfide which lit up every time a helium ion passed through the foil. It was expected that the particles would reflect off and away from the foil back towards the source of the shot at different angles, but it was found that that occurrence was rare. Most of the particles were able to pass through the gold foil and hit directly behind the foil on to the zinc sulfide sheet. The proposed that the center of the atom was where the nucleus was, and most of the atom was just space where electrons would circulate the nucleus as a cloud allowing the particles to pass through the foil. Thus, at the atomic level one would not be able to distinct the difference between different bodies of matter and their energies. This tested physical evidence should leave one with no other room except for one conclusion.
The cohesive and multi-perspective idea that all things are connected and have been drawn to existence for the purpose of further evolution has been presented and is not arguable. The widely accepted scientific conventions have been applied to human society of the 21st century and have defined a new foundation for human morals. Darwin’s principle has provided to humans that each one of their species and their differences are there for a reason, and almost implies that those who are ‘normal’ might be hindering the species from succession. Physicists Newton and Einstein have provided proof that all things remain as one thing through the conservation and conversion of matter into energy and energy into mass. The mathematics of quantum physics and a basic concept in simple chemistry has supported this and the permeability of the gold foil has provided physical evidence that things are one through the indistinguishable differences of matter and energy. Since this is so, it is rather ridiculous to cause physical, emotion or mental harm to a part of one’s self. As one would not intentionally do this, unless there is a malfunction within the subsystem of the whole—when one person is insane, to put it bluntly—it is now produced that there is no room for intolerance. The product of all these factors has deduced to the human world a new concept: the Universal Connectivity Theory. This is basis in which all things are part of a larger whole, and has purpose to be existent, which is reflected and paralleled in the ideology of reductionism, but with an extended premise and specific to human society. The extension being that when one subsystem or person finds that there is something ‘wrong’ with another subsystem or person based on the difference of their biological origin, such as colour, race and sexuality, and not their actions the first subsystem/person is then the organ that is malfunctioning and is impeding and diminishing the potential quality of the human race. Therefore, it is proven that tolerance is no longer an attitude, but a disease and can be curable through the exposure of the information that revolves around the Universal Connectivity Theory. There is no longer a reason to be judgmental of a person based on race/colour, origins or sexuality.

0
Comments

Not Rated
Avg. Rating

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Digg Share via email Share